Done. Am Mittwoch, den 25.09.2019, 11:28 +0000 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna: > Joachim, your trick worked, as well as my give-backs :) > > Can you please start again binNMUing stuff? > > Looks like ghc 8.6 built with 8.4 has a different hash compared with ghc 8.6 built with ghc 8.6... > So, a few binNMus are required now on bootstrapped archs... > (I wasn't aware of such "-prof" changes) > > G. > Il sabato 21 settembre 2019, 10:30:10 CEST, Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org> ha scritto: > > > thanks you both! > yes, my list had double packages (I'm pretty sure nmu will disregard duplicated lines), > and most important, some binNMUs on armhf scheduled after 11 of septembers were already good, because they picked up the "good" ghc and didn't depend on anything that picked up the bad one. > > But that said, all the haskell binNMUs will take a couple of hours, and have low priority, so they won't hurt too much :) > > G. > > Il sabato 21 settembre 2019, 09:50:28 CEST, Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org> ha scritto: > > > Am Samstag, den 21.09.2019, 10:49 +0300 schrieb Ilias Tsitsimpis: > > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 09:40AM, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > > just scheduled… > > > > ACK. I will close by bug. > > > > Also, Gianfranco's list had a typo in the version of `haskell-http` and > > was missing hslogger: > > > > nmu haskell-http_1:4000.3.14-1 . armhf . sid . -m 'rebuild with ghc_8.8.1+dfsg1+is+8.6.5+dfsg1-1' > > nmu hslogger_1.2.12-1 . armhf . sid . -m 'rebuild with ghc_8.8.1+dfsg1+is+8.6.5+dfsg1-1' > > > > Could you please schedule them as well? > > > done > > -- > Joachim “nomeata” Breitner • nomeata@debian.org • https://j.oach.im/ > > -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner • nomeata@debian.org • https://j.oach.im/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part