Hi, Am Samstag, den 21.09.2019, 10:35 +0300 schrieb Ilias Tsitsimpis: > Hi Gianfranco, Joachim > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 07:16AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Hello, I went to coccia, looked at daklog, and grepped all the armhf uploads since 11 of september, then cutted the ACCEPT message, and stripped down the non binNMUed version > > attached the list. > > If you schedule them, please ping me and I'll take care of what is bd-failed state, with some give-backs! > > > > Am Freitag, den 20.09.2019, 19:23 +0300 schrieb Ilias Tsitsimpis: > > > Hi Joachim, > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 05:37PM, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > > > might have been me, triggered by someone asking for binNMUs. > > > > > > Good to know. I am about to open a bug against release.debian.org to > > > request some binNMUs needed for armhf. Can I send them to you instead? > > > > yes, ideally in read-to-paste-into-wb form (as in > > https://people.debian.org/~nomeata/binNMUs-haskell.txt) just scheduled… > I have already opened a bug requesting these binNMUs[1]. Let's > coordinate on this so we don't end up scheduling them twice. > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=940850 > > Gianfranco, looking at your list it looks different than mine. I will > take a closer look to see why, I just wanted to let you know that I have > already requested the binNMUs. Sorry. But extra binNMUs aren’t that hurtful, at most a bit of waste of Buildd time. Cheers, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner • nomeata@debian.org • https://j.oach.im/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part