On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 12:28:45 -0700 John MacFarlane wrote: > Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org> writes: > > > On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 10:20:34 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > If you don't want the Debian package to diverge from the upstream > > behavior, please, at least, forward my wishlist bug report (with my > > patch) upstream! > > This could speed up the upstream patch adoption process, I guess... [...] > > If you care about the feature, you may propose it upstream on the > pandoc-discuss mailing list or the jgm/pandoc issue tracker on GitHub. > That is the way it will be most convenient for upstream developers > to consider it. I created that little patch and I sent it to the Debian package maintainers, since I thought it could be useful for other people. But I am currently not intending to get more heavily involved in pandoc upstream development. And I cannot register an account or subscribe to a mailing list for each and every upstream project I intend to make a little contribution to. Sorry about that. I am open to constructive criticism about my patch (via e-mail, please), if you, as pandoc upstream developer(s), are interested in taking a look at it and, possibly, in adopting (a refined version of) it. But I do not have the time to jump through bureaucratic hoops, in order to have the patch accepted upstream... -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgpASxjgiTL7l.pgp
Description: PGP signature