On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:56:46 +0200 Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Am Montag, den 03.08.2015, 23:34 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau: > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 22:55:17 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > > Can you tell whether the Haskell packages are entangled with the > > > GCC 5 transition? > > > > I'd rather not have both at the same time, regardless of any > > entanglement. > > with GCC5 in testing, and also the current “small” Haskell transition > done, is it now a good time to get GHC-7.10 into unstable and testing? > > This time, we ensured that all packages build at least on amd64, and > since then have done some staging in experimental, and if I read it > correctly we have only a build error on fringe architectures there, > mostly involving testsuite and doctests. I guess we can root them out > in experimental, and upload a (theoretically) perfect set of haskell > packages to unstable. I think we're still missing lambdabot and friends, because of haskell-misfortune's copyright. Otherwise I guess we're fine to go. (and actually I'm very excited about finally getting GHC 7.10) Regards Sven
Attachment:
pgpNEhUiq30gX.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP