Hi, Am Freitag, den 22.05.2015, 15:04 +0200 schrieb Dirk Hünniger: > Hi Georges, > I updated my Ubuntu now. Still there are differences between the package > naming in my version an current sid. > Still I don't think this is why the package was rejected. The problem > seems to be caused by this lintean tag: > > binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath > > Do you have any idea why that is? Its seems that many Haskell packages > have this issue. GHC defines rpaths in the binaries, although they are not actually used. This is mostly a cosmetic issue that eventually needs to be fixed in GHC. Until then, simply add a lintian override – that’s what I did in all cases. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part