[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Several broken dependencies (rendering other packages FTBFS)



Hi,

Am Donnerstag, den 19.06.2014, 12:25 +0100 schrieb Colin Watson:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 09:10:32AM -0700, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > correct. This is not automated, and sometimes I’m not aware that I have
> > to check. I scheduled a large bunch of binNMUs yesterday, so the
> > situation should improve.
> 
> We could do with another pass of your script if you get a moment; in
> particular I need haskell-http-conduit to be installable on amd64 so
> that I can upload fixes to haskell-authenticate-oauth and
> haskell-github, and I think that requires at least a haskell-warp-tls
> binNMU.

Done:
$ grep ^nmu binNMUs.txt |grep -w amd64
nmu haskell-yesod-persistent_1.2.3-1 . i386 sparc powerpc amd64 . -m 'missing libghc-warp-dev-3.0.0.1-1e258'
nmu haskell-wai-handler-launch_3.0.0-1 . i386 sparc s390x armel powerpc armhf amd64 . -m 'missing libghc-warp-dev-3.0.0.1-1e258'
nmu haskell-warp-tls_3.0.0-1 . i386 s390x armel powerpc armhf amd64 . -m 'missing libghc-warp-dev-3.0.0.1-41166'
nmu haskell-yesod-test_1.2.2-1 . i386 sparc powerpc amd64 . -m 'missing libghc-warp-dev-3.0.0.1-1e258'
nmu haskell-yesod-core_1.2.16.1-1 . i386 sparc powerpc amd64 . -m 'missing libghc-warp-dev-3.0.0.1-1e258'
nmu haskell-yesod-default_1.2.0-1 . i386 sparc powerpc amd64 . -m 'missing libghc-warp-dev-3.0.0.1-1e258'
nmu haskell-yesod-newsfeed_1.2.0-1 . i386 sparc powerpc amd64 . -m 'missing libghc-warp-dev-3.0.0.1-1e258'
nmu haskell-yesod-form_1.3.10-1 . i386 sparc powerpc amd64 . -m 'missing libghc-warp-dev-3.0.0.1-1e258'

Note that I currently schedule binNMUs only for packages broken on
amd64, we can do the rest once we are consistent again.

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: