Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 04.01.2012, 19:49 +0200 schrieb Konstantinos Margaritis: > On 4 January 2012 19:41, Clint Adams <clint@debian.org> wrote: > > Hi Neil, > > > > It looks like cmdargs started using TH between 0.8 and 0.9, but does > > not express the appropriate dependency. Could you please adjust > > the .cabal file? > > > > DHG: should we introduce a cmdargs0.8 package for the non-TH arches? > > I think we're also going to have the same problem with aeson soon. > > > > Konstantinos: are you interested in getting TH and GHCi to work on > > armhf? > > I'd definitely be interested as there are ~15 packages build-depending > on ghci on armhf, what's needed? Mind you I'm not knowledgeable about > haskell, I'm just fixing bugs while porting packages to armhf, but if > I can help with something, I'd be glad to do it. I don’t think there is anything armhf-special to do; first it needs to be supported on regular armel. Karel has been working on that previously. I’m not sure what exactly needs to be done, but AFAIK it requires work on the linker. If Konstantinos happens to know stuff about that, maybe you and Karel can cooperate? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part