Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 03.06.2010, 16:08 +0200 schrieb Giovanni Mascellani: > Il 03/06/2010 15:36, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva ha scritto: > >> It wasn't clear to me that a decision was made. All right, I'll remove > >> my doc-base in next uploads and won't add it in new packages. :-) > > > > Weel, I haven't seen a lot of arguments in favor of keeping it, so I thought we > > had an agreement. But I'm open to rediscuss it, if someone think it's the > > case. > > I have no really strong opinion about it: as a general case, I'm in > favor of providing doc-base unless there are reason not to do it; > personally, I don't see any such reason. Anyway, if majority is for not > using doc-base, I just adjust myself. the reason is that it’s linked from ghc6-doc – at least it is my starting point whenever i have to look something up. But in any case the correct place to add the files is in haskell-devscripts. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part