Hi, Am Dienstag, den 22.12.2009, 23:56 +0100 schrieb Giovanni Mascellani: > Just a question: is there any strong preference for using darcs, or is > git fine as well? I'm quite used to git and, if possible, would like > to continue with it. while there are git advocates in the group, and we don’t dictate an option, I’d suggest Darcs. Primary reason: I prefer it (for DHG purposes), and it’s integrated in http://pkg-haskell.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/pet.cgi which is a great plus when it comes to sponsoring uploads. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil