Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2009, 11:54 +1000 schrieb Trent W. Buck: > > until darcs on alioth is upgraded, please run "killall -KILL darcs" on > > alioth if darcs pushes fail: > > > > $ ps u -A|grep darcs > > 39948 16427 72.7 0.0 99700 7940 ? Rsl 09:41 158:14 darcs apply --all --repodir /darcs/pkg-haskell/haskell-curl > > 39948 4387 66.9 0.0 99700 8252 ? Rsl 10:25 116:26 darcs apply --all --repodir /darcs/pkg-haskell/haskell-curl > > 39948 9284 65.8 0.0 99704 8140 ? Rsl 10:32 109:30 darcs apply --all --repodir /darcs/pkg-haskell/haskell-dataenc > > 39948 10559 65.9 0.0 99704 8096 ? Rsl 10:34 108:29 darcs apply --all --repodir /darcs/pkg-haskell/haskell-curl > > 39948 15185 56.4 0.0 99700 8116 ? Rsl 11:44 53:24 darcs apply --all --repodir /darcs/pkg-haskell/haskell-safe > > 39948 5396 54.9 0.0 99696 8084 ? Rsl 12:17 34:03 darcs apply --all --repodir /darcs/pkg-haskell/haskell-uniplate > > While we're on the subject, can someone confirm that these > repository/ies are of format "darcs-2, hashed", and *not* of the super > horrible format "darcs-1" or "hashed"? > > Note that up until Darcs 2.2, "darcs init" would still default to the > old darcs-1 format, so it's quite possible to accidentally create > darcs-1 repos. given that darcsweb fails on them, I think they are darcs-2. These are usually created on unstable machines. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil