Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 09.07.2009, 21:52 +1000 schrieb Simon Horman: > > I’m not saying it’s not, I’m just saying we should give it a thought. > > There is already some bioinformatics software in Debian, so it should be > > ok – especially if it’s full applications, and not just “libraries that > > might be useful to some developers”. > > I'm not sure what the current criteria for Debian packages is. But it > seems to me that if its useful, even to a small number of people, someone > is willing to maintain it and its licence is acceptable, then it ought to > go in. Regardless of if it is a library or application. Regardless of if > the problem-space is already present in Debian or not. I’m sorry if I sounded a bit too negative, I certainly don’t want to any useful, free and maintained software to enter Debian. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil