Hi, Am Freitag, den 03.07.2009, 08:38 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: > Why is this needed? Isn't this mailing list proper for being used by > the packaging team? it’s good to separate the list for human discussions (d-haskell) from the list that is mentioned in the Maintainers: field and that gets all the automatic mails, to get a better signal-to-noise-ratio. I think this is what John has in mind, please correct me if I’m wrong. I’d say we continue all discussion here. We could even force a Reply-To: d-haskell@l.d.o header on mails that come via pkg-haskell-maintainers@l.a.d.o. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil