[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: seeking review of pat 0.19.1



On Sun, Dec 07, 2025 at 12:22:52PM -0500, Federico Grau wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 07, 2025 at 01:27:27PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > Federico Grau <donfede@casagrau.org> writes:
> > 
> > > Some questions/issues include (advise if these are better addressed OOB):
> > >
> > > a) golang-github-hashicorp-go-version in Debian is 1.6.0 . 
> > >    pat 0.19.1 released 2025-09-13 lists a dependency on 1.7.0 (but compiles ok
> > >    with 1.6.0).
> > >    Since then, a new hashicorp-go-version 1.8.0 was released 2025-11-28.
> ...
> > If things build, then I would start by getting 'pat' into unstable
> > first, and test if it works.  Having version diffs is unavoidable in the
> > Go/Debian ecosystem, what matters is if things works.
> > 
> > If you have time, please prepare hashicorp-go-version 1.8.0 and do
> > reverse builds of it and upload to unstable if it it works with all
> > reverse build dependencies.  But doing this is not a show-stopper for
> > 'pat'.
> > 
> > ...
> 
> 
> Kind thanks again for the constructive feedback Simon.  
> 
> 
> Concur with further testing of `pat' in unstable.
> 
> *** I welcome a sponsored upload as there are cycles to review and progress it.
> 
> 

* bump * 

Recognize we're in the middle of the holiday season.  Checking if `pat' may be
uploaded to unstable for additional testing and review, or if there are other
steps I should take?  Alternately, share if it's better to revisit this later
(2026-Jan).

Regards,
donfede

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: