Re: no dark theme in gnome-terminal 3.16 anymore?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi Sven,
thanks for the research! Sorry to see that feature go. The light
titlebar looks very distracting, especially if you use a dark terminal
theme and have the terminal in fullscreen. But anyways, thanks you!
Cheers,
Bastian
Am 01.06.2015 um 11:14 schrieb Sven Arvidsson:
> On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 09:13 +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> with doday's update, gnome-terminal got updated from 3.14 to
>> 3.16. After restarting the running terminals, I realized that the
>> top window border changed from dark to light. If I remember
>> correctly, in < 3.16 it was possible to configure whether
>> gnome-terminal uses the dark theme or not, but this option has
>> disappeared.
>>
>> Any chance to bring that option back, or make the dark theme the
>> default?
>
> Looks like it was a bunch of problems with that feature:
>
> commit 5f6c514a8840a5d1b87a8c399defee3b5052ec18 Author: Christian
> Persch <chpe@gnome.org> Date: Thu Jan 8 14:08:43 2015 +0100
>
> prefs: Remove dark theme pref
>
> It's more trouble than it's worth.
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707206
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=742040
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=742333
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649358
>
> src/org.gnome.Terminal.gschema.xml | 5 ----- src/preferences.ui
> | 16 ---------------- src/terminal-app.c | 4 ----
> src/terminal-prefs.c | 9 +--------
> src/terminal-schemas.h | 1 - 5 files changed, 1
> insertion(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
- --
Bastian Venthur http://venthur.de
Debian Developer venthur at debian org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=b+WP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: