Re: Meta-gnome3 dependency on xul-ext-adblock-plus (Bug #689858)
On 18/06/13 11:55, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 18.06.2013, 11:08 +0200 schrieb Jordi Mallach:
>> El dt 18 de 06 de 2013 a les 08:50 +0200, en/na Johannes Rohr va
>>> Now, maybe there is a good reason to include this package into the GNOME
>>> desktop metapackage, but if there is one, I'd like to know what it is. What
>>> is the rationale behind this decision? How do you define what is part of
>>> GNOME and what isn't?
>> meta-gnome3 (1:3.4+3) unstable; urgency=low
>> * Install iceweasel instead of epiphany :(
>> See bug#682481.
>> * Let gnome recommend iceweasel-l10n-all.
>> * Require firefox extensions that match epiphany functionality:
>> keyring, adblock.
> Thanks for filling me in! At the same time, there seem to be no open
> security related RC bugs file against epiphany in Debian at this time:
The problem is rather with webkit in general and/or webkitgtk+ in particular.