Am 03.11.2011 23:32, schrieb Robert Ross: > Is it too late to request distinct names for GNOME 3 packages? This boat has sailed, I'd say. The only case where this was used was gdm and gdm3. We also had this case for source package names, where we needed co-installability, like libwnck and libwnck3. > show time servers in version 2.30.2 but not 3.0.0 count as a > missing feature, a feature revision (perhaps the list was > intentionally moved elsewhere), or a regression bug? Some of them will be bugs, some design decisions. I guess we need to discuss this on a case by case basis. For gnome-system-tools, even if it got a GNOME 3 port, this package has reached EOL. Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature