Le vendredi 25 septembre 2009 à 13:44 +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit : > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 13:32:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > If, alternatively, the introspection data belongs in the same source > > package as the library it references, it can be put in the same binary > > package. In this case, it must feature a Provides: field corresponding > > to the name of the introspection data. For example, libfoo2.0-2 > > containing libfoo-2.0.so.2 and Foo-2.0.gir must provide gir1.0-foo-2.0. > > > Doesn't this break co-installability of libfoo2.0-X and libfoo2.0-Y, if > both install Foo-2.0.gir? Good point. Maybe we can recommend this solution only for libraries where this is not expected to happen. Or, given the (large) size of introspection stuff, to mandate having it always split. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in `- future understand things” -- Jörg Schilling
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=