Le jeudi 21 mai 2009 à 10:41 +0200, Michael Ott a écrit : > > > Unless more than one person starts working on it, it is becoming clear > > > to me that the plan is to wait for a very long time. > What do you mean with that sentence? You are the only one in the Gnome > team? How can I help when I am not a maintainer? Actually that’s a bit of an exaggeration, but apart from Luca Bruno and I, other maintainers don’t seem so eager to see GNOME 2.26 packaged. > > Let me also add that #517768 is a blocker for large parts of GNOME 2.26 > > and that we will be able to go forth only when it is fixed. Note that in the meantime, I have reassigned it so that it is not a blocker anymore. It is still a blocker for squeeze, of course, but it’s not blocking the transition anymore. > > If you want to help, start by reproducing this (MIME cache version 1.0 > > in your home, version 1.1 in the system, using nautilus 2.26) and try to > > understand why the 1.0 cache is not simply ignored by the xdgmime code > > in glib2.0. > Sorry for the stupid question. How can I find out which mime version I > use. I do not have this problem and I use nautilus 2.26. The home directory cache is only created when you add new MIME types at the user level. To create a 1.0 version cache, you need the pre-GNOME 2.24 tools: shared-mime-info 0.30, nautilus 2.22 + glib < 2.17 or nautilus 2.20 + gnome-vfs 2.22. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in `- future understand things” -- Jörg Schilling
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=