Le jeudi 11 septembre 2008 à 14:14 +0200, Michael Banck a écrit : > * Every patch should have a pseudo-header including the patch author > and a patch description, as well as, if applicable, debian bug, > upstream bug and upstream status (submitted, applied etc.). Sounds sane - apart from upstream status, which should be tracked by looking directly at the bug report instead of changing the package. > * naming scheme for patches based on upstream/debian status; dpatch and > quilt can apply patches in arbitrary order so prefixing numbers is > not required anymore; ISTR it was requested that we keep the numbers by the security team, so that management is closer to other patch systems. > however, having one of the prefixes local, > submitted and svn for Debian-specific changes, submitted patches and > upstream applied patches (as done e.g. by the glibc package) might be > desirable. If CDBS' simple-patchsys is used, a number can get > prefixed as well. Makes sense as well. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=