Re: GNOME 2.12
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> BTW, i hear t-p-u is finally unfucked (but then maybe i am misinformed), so
> would this not be the time to upload 2.6.12 to unstable, work on the etch
> 2.6.10 version through t-p-u, and so finally find out if t-p-u is a useful
> thing or just some vaporware that nobody is ever going to use ?
(2.6.12? 2.6.10? Are these kernels? I suppose you mean G2.10/2.12.)
No, TPU isn't meant for complex changes. For example you can't rework
your packages and upload them to TPU, they wouldn't get the testing
they need. And I'd certainly not use TPU to maintain the whole GNOME
suite for etch and maintain another suite in unstable; what exactly do
you think unstable is for?
I really don't see how you imagine TPU should work with 2.10/2.12, if
we were to upload G2.12 right now, I'd made sure it can transition
immediately to testing unless some new bugs are encountered.
Cheers,
--
Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
Reply to: