El sáb, 01-10-2005 a las 17:10 -0400, Alejandro Bonilla escribió: > On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 15:51:10 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote > > Hi, > > > > On Sat, Oct 01, 2005, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: > > > > Could you please comment on the schedule(s) I posted? > > > > Cheers, > > I´m no debian developer, but I think that is a waste of time of fixing a > version that will not be used in 2 months. etch willprobably go with > something like gnome 2.14 and Sid should not have something when there is > already a new version of it. If you want to move gnome 2.1* to etch, then > move 2.12 and not 2.10. Is a waste of time. I would just jump right to 2.12 > forget 2.10 bugs and then get 2.12 nicely and then move it down to > etch/testting. Yes, I agree with Alejandro. GNOME has a fixed release schedule and we don't. And though we can think that we are going to release in 18 months from Sarge release (which would be great), spending a lot of time in 2.10 is a waste of time, as for sure Etch is going to be released with at least 2.12. If we were just 2 months far from release, making this would be acceptable, but not just now. With this, I am not saying that GNOME 2.10 should be abandoned, but that 2.12 should start to be packaged and uploaded. Or it will happen that closer to our release, GNOME 2.14 is going to be released and we will want to include it in Etch, forcing people to jump from 2.10 to 2.14, which usually is more difficult and errors prone. Cheers, -- Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo jsogo@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part