Re: GNOME 2.12
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
> Are we going to start uploading GNOME 2.12 packages to unstable or at
> least to experimental? In my opinion we are lagging behind too much. And
> as I can see it there is no reason for it not being uploaded to
> unstable, as no package is being blocked now.
Some 2.12 packages were already uploaded to experimental. I proposed a
G 2.10 schedule in:
<http://lists.debian.org/debian-gtk-gnome/2005/09/msg00021.html>
and updated it in:
<http://lists.debian.org/debian-gtk-gnome/2005/09/msg00072.html>
Some transitions are blocking a couple of packages from migration to
testing, but I'd rather describe the current status of GNOME 2.10 as
"let's cleanup the BTS, FTBFS and important issues".
There are quite a number of important issues to solve right now, such
as FTBFS, RC bugs, security bugs, crashes.
I don't think this should prevent you of working on G2.12 in
experimental, but porting fixes back and forth is a waste of time.
Could you please comment on the schedule(s) I posted?
Cheers,
--
Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
Reply to:
- References:
- GNOME 2.12
- From: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <jsogo@debian.org>