Re: libgda/libgnomedb 1.2 transition
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 12:05:04AM +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 17:37 -0200, Gustavo R. Montesino wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm looking for advice on the transition of the gnome-db libraries to
> > their newer versions.
> >
> > At first, I had thought on renaming the packages in order to allow the
> > installation of the newer version along with the older one.
>
> libgda 2.0 (there are no tarball releases yet, I think) is meant to
> install in parallel with libgda 1.2, so there should be no problem. If
> you find conflicts then you should tell upstream as soon as possible.
>
> Or are you talking about libgda 1.0 versus libgda 1.2? I think in both
> 1.0 and 1.2, the libs very actually called libgda2, to add to the
> confusion.
Yes, I'm talking about libgda 1.0 (soname 1) and
libgda 1.2 (soname 3)
libgda 2.0 will take some time to be released as stable, AFAIK.
> > However,
> > some things are making me wonder if this was the right choice:
> >
> > * The long time the new libgda2-3 source package is already
> > sitting in NEW
>
> What upstream version of libgda is that?
1.2
--
Gustavo R. Montesino
Debian Brasil - http://www.debianbrasil.org/
Reply to: