On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 12:09 +0900, Seo Sanghyeon wrote:
> This was discussed before:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-gtk-gnome/2003/07/msg00176.html
Mailing to d-g-g, CCing d-d. My comments below.
> And see also Debian GNOME Packaging Policy:
> http://www.burtonini.com/computing/gnome-policy-20030502-1.html
>
> Quote: "Panel Applets. TODO: Panel applets -- "gnome-applet-foo"
> or "foo-applet" or "gnome-foo-applet?"
>
> I ran apt-rdepends on libpanel-applet2-0 and weeded out full
> applications which happened to provide applets. The result follows:
>
> "foo" style:
> apt-watch
> bubblemon
> flink
> glunarclock
> gxmms
> netapplet
> netspeed
> teatime
>
> "foo-applet" style
> gtodo-applet
> imhangul-status-applet
> lock-keys-applet
> mboxcheck-applet
> netmon-applet
> quick-lounge-applet
> rhythmbox-applet
> seti-applet
> xpenguins-applet
>
> "gnome-foo-applet" style:
> gnome-cpufreq-applet
> gnome-netstatus-applet
> gnome-randr-applet
> gnome-swallow-applet
>
> "foo-gnome" style:
> verbiste-gnome
> oooqstart-gnome
>
> "gnome-foo" style:
> gnome-blog
> gnome-pilot
>
> "foo-applet-gnome" style:
> uim-applet-gnome
>
> Which is, not consistent. I don't like "netspeed" package name, which is
> too generic, while its upstream name is "netspeed_applet". See
> http://mfcn.ilo.de/netspeed_applet/ .
Personally, I prefer gnome-foo-applet. In the cases where the applet
name contains "gnome" or "applet" it can be re-arranged.
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: ross@burtonini.com
jabber: ross@burtonini.com
www: http://www.burtonini.com./
PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part