Re: Gnome 2.6 in unstable should be ok now ...
Le ven 21/05/2004 à 15:50, James Strandboge a écrit :
> On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 07:47, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > Le ven, 21/05/2004 à 13:29 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar a écrit :
> > > Of course it's totally optional, but you could also try whether some of
> > > the common gnome backports upgrade well, maybe there are only
> > > easy-to-solve issues.
> > We can't support all non-official packages use ...
> > BTW I don't have time to do this, but if somebody want to test this it
> > would be nice!
> I will test my gnome2.2 backport to whatever is in sarge when sarge
> approaches release. I have taken the stance that this is my
> responsibility and will adjust my packages accordingly. I won't change
> the packages to continually follow unstable though, since the gnome2.2
> backport is supposed to be as stable as possible and not change all the
> time. :)
I will help you, as promised.
How much time will it take before G2.6 gets to Sarge, though? Any idea?
> Jamie Strandboge