Re: Gnome 2.6 in unstable should be ok now ...
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 07:47, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le ven, 21/05/2004 à 13:29 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar a écrit :
> > Of course it's totally optional, but you could also try whether some of
> > the common gnome backports upgrade well, maybe there are only
> > easy-to-solve issues.
> We can't support all non-official packages use ...
> BTW I don't have time to do this, but if somebody want to test this it
> would be nice!
I will test my gnome2.2 backport to whatever is in sarge when sarge
approaches release. I have taken the stance that this is my
responsibility and will adjust my packages accordingly. I won't change
the packages to continually follow unstable though, since the gnome2.2
backport is supposed to be as stable as possible and not change all the
GPG/PGP ID: 26384A3A
Fingerprint: D9FF DF4A 2D46 A353 A289 E8F5 AA75 DCBE 2638 4A3A