Re: gtk 2.4 and gnome 2.6
Starting from Beta 2 tarballs, GNOME is in hard code freeze for 2.6
-Rob
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 17:04 -0800, Link Dupont wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 13:47, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > Ross Burton <ross@burtonini.com> writes:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 05:58, John McCutchan wrote:
> > >> I am just wondering what the plan is for gtk 2.4 and gnome 2.6 getting
> > >> in to unstable? Since gnome 2.4 is in testing and testing's gnome is
> > >> frozen does this mean that gtk 2.4 and gnome 2.6 can go in to unstable
> > >> right away?
> > >
> > > My preferred course of action would be to upload GTK+ 2.4 into unstable
> > > pretty quickly as it is an independent library, but build GNOME 2.6 into
> > > experimental.
> >
> > Sorry I was away some days
> >
> > Just to give my opinion I'd like to start to upload Gnome2.6 & GTK2.4 in
> > experimental ASAP (we can start with preleases) and move all that in
> > unstable when it'll be ready.
>
> True, no reason why the beta releases and the RC's couldn't start
> getting packaged. They shouldn't change drastically from the final
> releases should they?
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Sebastien Bacher
> --
> Link Dupont <link@subpop.net>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: