Le mar 09/03/2004 à 17:17, Ross Burton a écrit : > On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 15:48, John McCutchan wrote: > > But I am wondering how much trouble it is to push > > G2.4 fixes in to testing with G2.6 in unstable. > > It's a World Of Pain. There is testing-proposed-updates, but it requires manual approval from the RM. > But what if we don't make it? There will be a possibly buggy G2.4 in > testing, which we cannot correct easily. By putting G2.6 into > experimental we keep it separate until it's ready, at which point we > push into unstable. If we start to realise we're not going to make 2.6 > for Sarge, we've got a fallback position with no hastle. Anyway Gnome 2.6 for sarge is out of question if we follow the release plan. If we package it for unstable, we need to stop its propagation to testing anyway. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org `. `' joss@debian.org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=