[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

help for misterious #213990 bug report for hardware-monitor requested.



Hello,

I am having a curious bug with my hardware-monitor package, which i
don't know how to solve. Upstream does not experience it, so it is
debian-specific, or something such.

The problem is that hardware-monitor dies when trying to add/edit
devices to be monitored. It dies with the following error (on the
command line) :

$ /usr/lib/gnome-panel/hardware-monitor
flex scanner jammed

And well, altough i think this is flex related, it don't seem that flex
is part of the hardware-monitor dependencies :

Depends: bonobo-activation (>= 1:2.2.4), libart-2.0-2 (>= 2.3.8),
libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.2.4), libbonobo-activation4 (>= 1:2.2.4), libbonobo2-0
(>= 2.2.3), libbonobomm1.3-8 (>= 1.3.7-2), libbonoboui2-0 (>= 2.2.4),
libbonobouimm1.3-7, libc6 (>= 2.3.2-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.3.1-1),
libgconf2-4 (>= 2.2.1), libgconfmm2.0-1c102, libglade2-0 (>= 2.0.0),
libglademm2.0-1c102, libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.2.3), libgnome2-0 (>= 2.1.90),
libgnomecanvas2-0 (>= 2.1.90), libgnomecanvasmm2.0-1c102,
libgnomemm1.3-10, libgnomeui-0 (>= 2.1.90), libgnomeuimm1.3-18,
libgnomevfs2-0 (>= 2.2.5), libgnomevfs2-common (>= 2.2.5), libgtk2.0-0
(>= 2.2.1), libgtkmm2.0-1c102, libgtop2, liblinc1 (>= 1:1.0.0),
liborbit2 (>= 1:2.6.0), liborbit2cpp7, libpanel-applet2-0 (>= 2.0.0),
libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.2.1), libsensors-1debian1, libsigc++-1.2-5c102,
libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.3.1-1), libxml2 (>= 2.5.9), xlibs (>> 4.1.0), zlib1g
(>= 1:1.1.4)

Also, running hardware-monitor through gdb doesn't yield anything more
than the above message, and no backtrace to be had whatsoever.

What is worst, this problem did not appear in 0.7-1, which i compiled
some time earlier, but which failed due to a dependency to an older
libbonobomm or something such.

Please, if anyone has an idea about this one, i would be real happy. If
this cannot be solved, i fear hardware-monitor would have to be removed
from sarge (i somehow doubt that the sarge 0.5.1-1 still runs, not sure
though, as there where some strange libsensor stuff going on).

Friendly,

Sven Luther



Reply to: