On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 11:01, Christian Marillat wrote: > "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <fsmla@xinara.org> writes: > > > On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 05:52:16 +0100, Christian Marillat wrote: > >> Why my package (libgnomeprint and libgnomeprintui) are NMUed ? > > > > Gnumeric 1.2.2 needed newer versions of libgnomeprint and libgnomeprintui > > than were in sid. There had been zero response from the maintainer regarding > > updates on several libgnomeprint bugs, including an FTBFS one. Given the > > communicational attitude displayed by the maintainer on previous occastions > > and the lack of response on the bug reports, I decided not to bother with > > further attempts to get the maintainer into action and NMUed. > > Are you serious ? All these bugs are tagged pending since 2 weeks > If you can't upload fixes within 2 weeks, I seriously suggest you reduce the number of packages you incorrectly claim to 'maintain'. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part