Re: Unwanted NMU
Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org> writes:
> Christian Marillat <marillat.christian@wanadoo.fr> writes:
[...]
>> | libgnomeprintui (2.4.2-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium
>> |
>> | * NMU
>> | * New upstream release (needed for gnumeric 1.2.2).
>
> What's the problem with that ? The upload seems to be because a new
> version is needed by gnumeric 1.2.2 ... I don't know if JHM has
> contacted you before (and he should have), but if gnumeric is broken due
> to libgnomeprintui, and don't see where is the problem to update it ?
Because I'm not *dead* an I'm able to do uploads. I hope this is a good
argument ?
> We all want to have a full working system, who bother if one upload is
> done by the usual maintainer or by an another ...
>
>
>> I still think that this NMU is a personnal attack, like this e-mail.
>
> What's the matter with you ? Why not working with the others maintainers
> ? Why taking all uploads/mails/... has a personal attack ? You think
> that maintainers' goal is only to attack you ?
Yes, read this list archive.
> One more time: we try to have the best distribution possible, and we
> doesn't work against the others. What's such the big deal to have an NMU
> on one of his packages ?
The problem is I'm personally attacked on this list since 3 months and
I'm fucking tired with that.
Christian
Reply to: