Re: Unwanted NMU
Christian Marillat <marillat.christian@wanadoo.fr> writes:
> Since when bugs need to be fixed by NMUs ? We have the BTS for that. And
> I'm still waiting to see any report fixing a bug from you.
I'm not the NMUer, and I don't know why JHM has done it, but usually he
does a pretty good job on a lot of packages.
>> be the case here) ... that's not such a big deal ... is it ?
>
> Yes, when I read the changelog for this NMU :
>
> | libgnomeprintui (2.4.2-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium
> |
> | * NMU
> | * New upstream release (needed for gnumeric 1.2.2).
What's the problem with that ? The upload seems to be because a new
version is needed by gnumeric 1.2.2 ... I don't know if JHM has
contacted you before (and he should have), but if gnumeric is broken due
to libgnomeprintui, and don't see where is the problem to update it ?
We all want to have a full working system, who bother if one upload is
done by the usual maintainer or by an another ...
> I still think that this NMU is a personnal attack, like this e-mail.
What's the matter with you ? Why not working with the others maintainers
? Why taking all uploads/mails/... has a personal attack ? You think
that maintainers' goal is only to attack you ?
One more time: we try to have the best distribution possible, and we
doesn't work against the others. What's such the big deal to have an NMU
on one of his packages ?
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
Reply to: