On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 02:52:23PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 02:50:20PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> writes:
> >
> > > So, how are we preventing bits of Gnome 2.4 to go into sarge before
> > > everything is ready, and break the 2.2 stuff there ?
> >
> > Packages that breaks other stuffs don't enter in testing ...
>
> If the dependency are fully aware of the breakage.
Time for a gnome2.2 meta-package in testing that conflicts with all the
2.4 packages of GNOME core? But that may get us into some epoch hackery
later on. Comments?
Cheers,
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau
--
*******************************************************************************
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau Computer Sci. UNSW & Debian GNU/Linux
<netsnipe(+)users.sf.net\0> <alau(+)cse.unsw.edu.au\0>
GnuPG 1024D/2E8B68BD: 0B77 73D0 4F3B F286 63F1 9F4A 9B24 C07D 2E8B 68BD
-
"Nobody expects the Debian Inquisition!
Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency!"
*******************************************************************************
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature