[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: debian-desktop, and relevant thoughts.



Le ven 12/09/2003 à 19:32, Sven Luther a écrit :
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 03:26:30AM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > <quote who="Ghe Rivero">
> > 
> > > I'm one of the fanatics that had been working on the Ximian Desktop port
> > > to Woody (Actually the only one packaging an preparing the patches). By
> > > the end of this week I hope to have finish with the last release and put
> > > all the sources available (at least most of then).
> > > 
> > > Apart of this, i like XD2, and most of the improvements that they have
> > > done, but not all. It could be great if we could integrate some patches
> > > into the Debian desktop. I don't mind if gnome2.2 or Gnome2.4 goes into
> > > next stable. I'm actually working with the next XDunstable, based on
> > > Gnome2.4, so i can help anybody to have a real good desktop for Debian..
> > 
> > Ghe, I'm still not clear why you're doing this, particularly when you're
> > doing it independently of the larger woody backport project that is already
> > running. Just about all of the Ximian stuff is *already present* in Debian's
> > GNOME, minus a few fairly arguable patches here and there... I really don't
> > grok why you have a whole separate effort for so little benefit beyond the
> > current Debian unstable GNOME (including the existing woody backport)...
> 
> BTW, i am searching for woody backported 4.2.1 or 4.3.0 powerpc XFree86
> packages, maybe you have an idea were to find such, and where is this
> 'larger existing woody backport' located ?
I guess you are talking about "James'" backports.
They are not currently available for any other architecture that i386.
If some of you could give me shell access to other machines, I promise
to try to work on it.

> Friendly,
> 
> Sven Luther
-- 
Jérôme Warnier <jwarnier@beeznest.net>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=


Reply to: