* Matt Brubeck (mbrubeck@cs.hmc.edu) wrote: > On Apr 12, Eric Dorland wrote: > > > Well if you're running automake yourself then you should build depend > > on it. But you shouldn't run it yourself if you can avoid it. > > The exact situation is that nautilus build-depends on gnome-common, > which depends on automaken. Should gnome-common depend on a specific > automake package instead of automaken? Ahh, well it's a bit hard to know. Does most of gnome still use automake 1.4? A better dependency would probably be automake1.4 | automaken > > Build-Depend on whatever automake nautilus upstream uses (probably > > automake1.4 or automake1.7). > > Nautilus builds correctly with automake1.4. > > > Don't use automake1.5, it sucks, and hopefully I'll get off my duff > > and get it removed from the archive soon. > > Good to hear that. Yeah, what I should really do is beat up automake upstream for making all these packages necessary, but what are you gonna do? :-D -- Eric Dorland <eric.dorland@mail.mcgill.ca> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: hooty@jabber.com 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
pgpjMTbSGDFKi.pgp
Description: PGP signature