Re: gnome2 and libgtk2 png3
On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 18:55, micah craig wrote:
> Forgive me if this issue has been fully resolved, and I'm just doing
> something wrong, but I've slogged through the last month of list
> archives and couldn't find a very direct response to this issue. I
> upgraded to gnome2 in experimental quite early, and have been fairly
> happily running gnome 2 stuff for a number of months now. However, I've
> gotten caught up in the libgtk2.0-0png3 upgrade fun, which I think I
> basically understand, and which seems to be largely resolved in
> unstable. My problem is this:
> atom:/home/micah# apt-get install libgtk2.0-0png3
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> The following extra packages will be installed:
> gconf-editor gconf2 glade-common-2 glade-gnome-2 gnome-gv
> libbonoboui2-0
> libbonoboui2-common libeel2-2 libeel2-data libgail-common libgail17
> libglade2-0 libgnome-desktop-0 libgnomecanvas2-0 libgnomedb2-1
> libgnomedb2-common libgnomeprintui-0 libgnomeui-0 libgnutls5
> libgtk-common
> libgtk2.0-common libgtkhtml2-0 librsvg2-2 libtasn1-0 libwnck4 metacity
> metatheme python2.2-glade2 python2.2-gtk2 yelp
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
> eog2 gnome-applets2 gnome-control-center2 gnome-media2
> gnome-panel-data2
> gnome-panel2 gnome-session2 gnome-terminal2 libgail11 libgail13
> libgail16
> libgail9 libgnome2-segv libgtk2.0-0 libpanel-applet2-0 librsvg2-1
> libzvt2-0
> mozilla-browser-snapshot mozilla-mailnews-snapshot
> mozilla-psm-snapshot
> rep-gtk-gnome2 rep-gtk2 sawfish-merlin-ugliness sawfish2
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> libgail17 libgnutls5 libgtk2.0-0png3 libtasn1-0
> 27 packages upgraded, 4 newly installed, 24 to remove and 5 not
> upgraded.
> Need to get 7602kB of archives. After unpacking 60.5MB will be freed.
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n
> Abort.
Try apt-get -t experimental install libgtk2.0-0png3
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast
Reply to: