Re: Gnome 2 summary 11/03/2002
>>>>> On 11 Mar 2002 15:54:31 +0100,
>>>>> "CM" == Christian Marillat <marillat.christian@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
CM> Hi,
CM> glib/gtk 2 is out.
I've just uploaded all GTK+ 2.0 families and these packages
is changed source package name and binary package name.
the packages list is here:
glib2.0
- libglib2.0-0
- libglib2.0-data
- libglib2.0-dev
- libglib2.0-doc
- libglib2.0-dbg
atk1.0
- libatk1.0-0
- libatk1.0-dev
- libatk1.0-doc
- libatk1.0-dbg
pango1.0
- libpango1.0-0
- libpango1.0-common
- libpango1.0-dev
- libpango1.0-doc
- libpango1.0-dbg
gtk+2.0
- libgtk2.0-0
- libgtk2.0-common
- libgtk2.0-dev
- libgtk2.0-doc
- libgtk2.0-dbg
- gtk2.0-examples
My apologies, if you have already installed GNOME 2.0 beta
for debian, they will be removed because of package
dependencies. mainly -common packages conflicted old -common
packages. so when they will need to rename a source package
the next time, I provided the magic to them in this time
that we never get this problem again. I hope they can be
upgraded the next time.
So let's rebuild time.
BTW, Christian, do we need to add libgail-gnome to your
GNOME2 list?
CM> |bug-buddy |2.1.3 |2.0.8-1|Bug "New upstream release available"|
it seems to be uploaded.
Regards,
--
Akira TAGOH : tagoh@gnome.gr.jp / Japan GNOME Users Group
at@gclab.org : tagoh@gnome-db.org / GNOME-DB Project
: tagoh@redhat.com / Red Hat, Inc.
: tagoh@debian.org / Debian Project
Reply to: