Re: Are circular dependencies problematic?

To: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
Cc: Arnaud Rebillout <arnaudr@debian.org>, Richard Hansen <rhansen@rhansen.org>, debian-go@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Are circular dependencies problematic?
From: Andrew Lee <ajqlee@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 16:43:59 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] CACpy4ovvKtbR1vP_uWxaEKki0P7CiW9p0kNGq+43JN-u9pyVbQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87cy1j8wzz.fsf@josefsson.org>
References: <[🔎] 2be855ac-5b72-4278-afeb-4e187a856f6b@rhansen.org> <[🔎] adccee48-b32b-41e2-b78f-4610b7ed6feb@debian.org> <[🔎] CACpy4otXiWkk509HPYTRKohQ5srHQUnB19cAt-JufVwVfPArYA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 87cy1j8wzz.fsf@josefsson.org>

Hello Simon and others,

On Wed, Mar 4, 2026 at 3:55 PM Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> wrote:
> Even better if that bootstrapping is part of debian/rules and explained
> in debian/README.source so others can reproduce it.

It should be workable for all kind of circular dependency case, not
only in a specific package.
Should I just make a small demo talk during DebConf?

Regards,
-- 
-Andrew

Reply to:

References:
- Are circular dependencies problematic?
  - From: Richard Hansen <rhansen@rhansen.org>
- Re: Are circular dependencies problematic?
  - From: Arnaud Rebillout <arnaudr@debian.org>
- Re: Are circular dependencies problematic?
  - From: Andrew Lee <ajqlee@debian.org>
- Re: Are circular dependencies problematic?
  - From: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Are circular dependencies problematic?
Next by Date: Re: Are circular dependencies problematic?
Previous by thread: Re: Are circular dependencies problematic?
Next by thread: Re: Are circular dependencies problematic?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread