Hi! El 30/09/25 a las 10:11, Simon Josefsson escribió: > Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> writes: > > > https://salsa.debian.org/jas/golang-go.crypto/-/pipelines/947073 > > > >> I already ran for the baseline > >> https://salsa.debian.org/otto/golang-go.crypto/-/pipelines/946961 so > > My 100+ job pipeline finished (quickly!). Failures for 0.42.0: > > aptainer: FTBFS bug report filed for unstable, not in your pipeline => > not a blocker > > caddy: FTBFS bug report filed for unstable, not in testing, not in your > pipeline => not a blocker > > etcd: same self-test problem as in baseline, does not occur on > buildd/debci/reprobuild => not a blocker > > gitlab-ci-multi-runner: FTBFS bug report filed for unstable, not in > testing, not in your pipeline => not a blocker > > Based on this partial pre-upload reverse build check, I have uploaded to > unstable using tag2upload. Let's watch the reverse build flood coming! > (and let's fix all FTBFS issues in other packages that may arise..) Thanks! A little late comment: currently, it is possible to test reverse dependencies autopkgtest with Debusine. Regression tests is WIP, but what I have done is upload to Debusine both, the current archived version and the version I'm working on, and compare results. To summarize: Salsa CI has reverse dep build support. Debusine has reverse autopkgtest support. Cheers, -- S
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature