Re: Status with Static-Built-Using substvar?
Hi!
On Wed, 18 Sept 2024 at 11:48, Louis-Philippe Véronneau
<pollo@debian.org> wrote:
>
> On 2024-09-15 11:45, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >>> I was reviewing a new Debian package at
> >>> https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian-ssg/-/merge_requests/2 where
> >>> Lintian nags about `statically-linked-binary`.
> >>
> >> Please help moving this MP[1] so lintian stops nagging
> >> `statically-linked-binary` for your package.
> >>
> >> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/456
> >
> > Thanks for the pointer! Incidentally, Pollo is reviewing both
> > https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/456 and
> > https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian-ssg/-/merge_requests/2
> >
> > There is also https://bugs.debian.org/947630 ("lintian still gives E:
> > statically-linked-binary for golang project's binary") with no updates
> > since 2020, maybe it can be closed together with this.
>
> I'm currently waiting for the code rework (putting things in a function)
> Christopher Obbard say he'd do :)
>
> Once that's done, I'll merge the MR.
I just wanted to bump this up.
Maybe Christopher can now rebase
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/456 and
include BuiltUsing.pm, and Loius-Philippe reconsider merging it?
Reply to: