Hi Nilesh, On Sat, 2023-12-23 at 22:21 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > However it seems to me that you renamed gitea/tea into gtea. > I would suggest renaming it to gitea-tea or gitea-cli so as to make it clear > what the source package/binary does. From user pov I find it a little > unlikely to find "gtea" looking at the package names. > > LMK WDYT? When I first started packaging tea, I considered renaming to to something like tea-cli (upstream calls it 'tea', binary is named 'tea'), but it's a bit annoying to type, so I went with gtea. If you think tea-cli would be a better name, then please rename the Salsa repo, and as soon as that happens, I'll update d/control and d/changelog. Kind regards, Maytham
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part