Re: [RFS] golang-github-smallstep-cli
On 7 July 2021 2:25:27 am IST, Peymaneh Nejad <p.nejad@posteo.de> wrote:
>>IMO, if you can, you really should package this binary. I think the
>target is not to get everything in somehow, but to get all packages in
>excellent condition that might leave minimal scope for improvement.
>>The only problem I see here is that if at some point in time, we need
>smallstep-cli, then we'll have to loop via NEW queue again, which I
>prefer avoiding.
>>However, if you think that this is redundant, and we can just go ahead
>with the binary, fair enough.
>
>Acknowledged.
>I didn't consider that a later package split might be an issue. To
>avoid double looping via NEW queue we could wait with an upload, and
>once I am done with the other dependencies and caddy packaging, I would
>revisit smallstep/cli and see if there is maybe time to do a binary
>package.
>What do you think?
Fair enough.
>Anyhow, in case I can't make it within GSoC timeline, I would
>definitely like to improve it at some later point. Figuring my way
>through these dependencies sounds like a good learning experience also
Indeed. However if you *really* want to get this in at this point, I'll upload.
Nilesh
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Reply to: