Re: [request for review] golang-testify fixing #988101
On 2021, മേയ് 8 12:19:58 PM IST, Shengjing Zhu <zhsj@debian.org> wrote:
>On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 10:56:37AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8 May 2021 9:58:49 am IST, Shengjing Zhu <zhsj@debian.org> wrote:
>> >On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 02:33:22AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I have pushed a fix for #988101: golang-testify to salsa[1], and I'm
>> >> able to build it now with abel.d.o porter box (armhf porterbox)
>> >>
>> >> Although minor change, I'd really appreciate a review before I upload
>> >> this to unstable since this is a key package[1]
>> >>
>> >> Please consider to review and upload, or give me a green signal and
>> >I'll
>> >> do so.
>> >>
>> >
>> >LGTM, and uploaded.
>>
>> Thanks a lot!
>>
>> >Would you like to do unblock request?
>>
>> This package has non superficial autopkgtests[1] (not neutral) - do we even need an unblock request?
>>
>
>Yes, it's a key package. https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_packages.yaml.cgi
>
>https://release.debian.org/bullseye/freeze_policy.html:
>
>> Full Freeze ... For key packages and packages without autopkgtests, the rules stay the same
>
I think checking tracker.debian.org and see if it is blocked by freeze is a good way to know if we need unblock request or not.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Reply to: