[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [request for review] golang-testify fixing #988101




On 5/8/21 12:19 PM, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 10:56:37AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8 May 2021 9:58:49 am IST, Shengjing Zhu <zhsj@debian.org> wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 02:33:22AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I have pushed a fix for #988101: golang-testify to salsa[1], and I'm
>>>> able to build it now with abel.d.o porter box (armhf porterbox)
>>>>
>>>> Although minor change, I'd really appreciate a review before I upload
>>>> this to unstable since this is a key package[1]
>>>>
>>>> Please consider to review and upload, or give me a green signal and
>>> I'll
>>>> do so.
>>>>
>>>
>>> LGTM, and uploaded. 
>>
>> Thanks a lot!
>>
>>> Would you like to do unblock request?
>>
>> This package has non superficial autopkgtests[1] (not neutral) - do we even need an unblock request?
>>
> 
> Yes, it's a key package. https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_packages.yaml.cgi
> 
> https://release.debian.org/bullseye/freeze_policy.html:
> 
>> Full Freeze ... For key packages and packages without autopkgtests, the rules stay the same

Ah, oops I clearly missed that. I filed an unblock request #988228:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988228

Thanks a lot,
Nilesh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: