Re: [request for review] golang-testify fixing #988101
On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 10:56:37AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>
>
> On 8 May 2021 9:58:49 am IST, Shengjing Zhu <zhsj@debian.org> wrote:
> >On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 02:33:22AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have pushed a fix for #988101: golang-testify to salsa[1], and I'm
> >> able to build it now with abel.d.o porter box (armhf porterbox)
> >>
> >> Although minor change, I'd really appreciate a review before I upload
> >> this to unstable since this is a key package[1]
> >>
> >> Please consider to review and upload, or give me a green signal and
> >I'll
> >> do so.
> >>
> >
> >LGTM, and uploaded.
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> >Would you like to do unblock request?
>
> This package has non superficial autopkgtests[1] (not neutral) - do we even need an unblock request?
>
Yes, it's a key package. https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_packages.yaml.cgi
https://release.debian.org/bullseye/freeze_policy.html:
> Full Freeze ... For key packages and packages without autopkgtests, the rules stay the same
Reply to: