Re: RFS: easygen 3.0 & golang-github-go-easygen-easygen-dev
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 12:40 PM Dawid Dziurla <dawidd0811@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I just successfully built your package and the only warnings I got
> from lintian were:
> - binary-without-manpage usr/bin/easygen
> - package-contains-vcs-control-file
> usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/go-easygen/easygen/test/.gitignore
thanks a lot for the review Dawid.
For the man page. I'm working on it, besides other major changes down
the road. so let's skip it this time.
For the, package-contains-vcs-control-file, how can I remove that file
from the source?
thx
> Also, you can easily generate manpage with help2man utlity.
>
> śr., 20 mar 2019 o 16:45 Tong Sun a):
> >
> > Dear Go team,
> >
> > I am looking for (help and) a sponsor for the package "easygen" at
> > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/easygen
> >
> > The package was tested on both gbp and sbuild.
> > It's also lintian-clean, with the following known issues:
> >
> > - no man page. I'm working on it, besides other major changes down the road
> > - the statically-linked-binary error, which deemed OK by Florian. Details below.
> >
> > Could you please reviewing/sponsoring this?
> >
> > Any kind of reviews and suggestions are appreciated.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 5:55 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> > >
> > > * Tong Sun:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 5:43 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> > I've upload the package "easygen" to
> > > >> > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/easygen
> > > >> >
> > > >> > It is still having the above statically-linked-binary problem.
> > > >
> > > >> This is a Go binary which does not link with glibc, only with the Go
> > > >> runtime. There is no technical problem with that, it's the preferred
> > > >> method of building such applications. ...
> > > >>
> > > >> I think the lintian check needs to be improved. There was already a
> > > >> bug about it:
> > > >
> > > > Oh, thanks for looking into it and the confirmation Florian!
> > > >
> > > > I'll submit a formal RFS letter later. Or, if you find no other
> > > > issues with it, would you sponsor me please?
> > >
> > > Sorry, I'm not a Go package maintainer (and I'm barely a Debian
> > > developer these days).
> >
Reply to: