Control: severity -1 normal Hi, On 15-09-2025 21:09, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On 2025-09-15 17:40, Bastian Germann wrote:Is this armel bug still serious?Oops, I forgot to follow on that one. I have been able to progress a bit on that, and it's actually not specific to armel. It could have happen more often on armel runners because they were more loaded. There are more details in the upstream discussion: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2025-February/164566.html
But it seems that the failure rate even on armel when we still had it dropped so low that I don't consider this RC.
Paul
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature