Bug#1111805: ld.so.conf settings prefer /lib over /usr/lib (drop /lib from ld.so.conf entirely?)

[Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org>]

Am 15.09.25 um 13:49 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> The setup of libgctp is also a bit special:
>
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     18 Sep  5 13:31 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ 
> > libgctp-2.0.0.so -> libgctp-2.so.2.0.0
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     18 Sep  5 13:31 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ 
> > libgctp-2.0.0.so.2 -> libgctp-2.so.2.0.0
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 141224 Sep  5 13:31 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ 
> > libgctp-2.so.2.0.0
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     18 Sep  5 13:31 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ 
> > libgctp.so -> libgctp-2.so.2.0.0
>
>
> So this could either be a bug in dpkg-shlibdeps, libgctp or the three 
> packages linking against libgctp.

lintian is also not happy about this it seems:

https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?packages=libgctp

libgctp 	2.0.0-12 (forky sid) 	libgctp-2.0.0/2.0.0-12 	error 
lacks-versioned-link-to-shared-library 	1 
usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgctp-2.0.0.so 
[usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgctp-2.so.2.0.0]

https://udd.debian.org/lintian-tag/lacks-versioned-link-to-shared-library

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature