[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#585737: marked as done (locales: upgrade not atomic)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Mar 2021 21:55:37 +0100
with message-id <43b04122-a47b-31d6-d220-2540e920dc6b@debian.org>
and subject line upgrade report for EOL Debian release
has caused the Debian Bug report #585737,
regarding locales: upgrade not atomic
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
585737: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=585737
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: locales
Version: 2.11.1-3
Severity: minor

When locales is upgraded at the same time as other packages, there are
quite a few things that run between the removal of the old locales and
the generation of the new ones. This is most visible with the perl
warning:

perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
	LANGUAGE = (unset),
	LC_ALL = (unset),
	LC_COLLATE = "C",
	LANG = "en_US.UTF-8"
    are supported and installed on your system.
perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").
locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory

which appears a lot in the configuration of other packages or in some
triggers (but not at all when locales isn't being upgraded).

Some packages seem to have a way to tell apt that they want to be
upgraded alone, I wonder if locales deserves the same...

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages locales depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]         1.5.32     Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 [glibc-2.11-1]          2.11.1-3   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib

locales recommends no packages.

locales suggests no packages.

-- debconf information:
* locales/default_environment_locale: en_US.UTF-8
* locales/locales_to_be_generated: All locales

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Dear reporter,

Thanks for taking the time long ago to submit your upgrade report. I'm
closing these reports now because the Debian releases they were reported
against have reached their end-of-life (some long ago).

Unfortunately it's possible that the report I'm now closing may still
have relevant information for the current release (bullseye). If you
believe that's the case, don't hesitate to reopen the bug, retitle it
and provide further information and it will be seen during the current
freeze period of Debian.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: