Re: Bug#974552: upgrade-reports: libc6/libcrypt split breaks perl during buster->bullseye upgrade
- To: 974552@bugs.debian.org, debian-glibc@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#974552: upgrade-reports: libc6/libcrypt split breaks perl during buster->bullseye upgrade
- From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2021 22:15:46 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 04ddd1fb-784f-d72a-323a-9702cf44e440@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <b4b76f5473b139a2a181077cfb833eb63c6ed2f1.camel@gmx-topmail.de>
- References: <20201116163919.GA29652@urchin.earth.li> <20201120083023.GG2297@aurel32.net> <20201120091349.GA7014@urchin.earth.li> <b4b76f5473b139a2a181077cfb833eb63c6ed2f1.camel@gmx-topmail.de> <b4b76f5473b139a2a181077cfb833eb63c6ed2f1.camel@gmx-topmail.de>
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:44:50 +0100 Alois Wohlschlager
<alois1@gmx-topmail.de> wrote:
> > > > Another option might be to have the new libc6 Conflict with old
> > > > versions
> > > > of Essential:yes packages that need libcrypt1, forcing those
> > > > Essential:yes
> > > > packages to get upgraded first. A quick check based on libcrypt1
> > > > reverse
> > > > dependencies in sid shows perl-base, login and util-linux. I'm
> > > > not sure
> > > > if this list is exhaustive, though.
>
> Having libc6 Conflict with one of those packages should be enough,
> right?
Shouldn't this bug be reassigned to libc6?
Paul
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Reply to: